Implementation of Technology in Education

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Cody Stock, graduate student University of St. Francis, MS Training and Development program.

Technology takes down the walls of the classroom and enables students to access information in ways they otherwise could not. With so much technology, how is it effectively integrated into education? In a recent article, Shazmeen Mengal (2023), provides steps to effectively implement technology into education environments. These steps offer guidance on using and integrating new technology seamlessly, while assessing which tools align to the classroom needs and personalizing the learning experience to the specific audience. The author concludes that the success of technology integration requires a planned approach and using that technology as a tool to enhance the educational experience.

I recommend this article for anyone who works in education and is looking to implement new technology into their online classroom. The step-by-step guide provides useful insights by asking questions to ensure that the technology being chosen aligns with the objectives and curriculum in mind. These steps also keep the classroom needs front of mind by asking what is trying to be achieved with this implementation. These steps of technology integration are briefly described and are a great starting point for anyone looking to improve their online classroom environment.

Reference:

Mengal, Shazmeen. (2023, September). How technology has changed the education system.

Retrieved from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-technology-has-changed-education-system-shazmeen-mengal/

Interactive Learning Tools That Won’t Break Your Budget

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Brianna Richardson, graduate student University of St. Francis, MS Training and Development program.

The most effective eLearning courses utilize interactive components to drive engagement. However, training budgets may not always allow for the purchase of new technology. “15 Free Interactive eLearning Tools” by Hannah Malmstrom (2022) provides a list of interactive tools that won’t break the budget for trial and pilot adoption. The author provides a comprehensive review of a variety of platforms that can be used to increase engagement in online courses. Each review includes criteria such as highlights, best use, and cost. The tools named offer features that are in alignment with current eLearning trends like microlearning, social learning, and collaboration.


I recommend this article for instructors that are researching different learning management systems to help boost engagement in their online courses. The list of 15 free tools features a variety of platforms that creates a comparison view and allows the reader to identify those to research further. The solutions offer ways for learners to interact using quizzes, games, and progress reporting. Malmstrom (2022) goes the extra mile and even highlights who the best audience is for some of the tools. This allows the person researching to focus their attention on the features and audience that would best suit their need.

Reference

Malstrom, H. (2022, January 10). 15 free interactive eLearning tools. EdApp Microlearning. https://www.edapp.com/blog/10-interactive-elearning-tools/

Starting Up Online Medical Education?

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Tricia Padgurskis, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

Are medical schools using quality assurance guidelines to develop their online curriculum? If you were tasked to setup a new online medical education program, would you know how to start?

In the peer-reviewed, BMC Medical Education Journal, Wasfy et. al. (2021) felt there are gaps in the quality standards of online curriculum among medical schools.  They set out to create a list of criteria for best practice in online learning in medical education.  The criteria was based on the data collected from focus groups of novice and expert faculty in online higher medical education.  In this article, the authors list important guided questions to consider when developing online education, including: governance, administration, academic council, faculty and student online training needs, organizational capacity, resources, bylaws, course delivery, course design, learning assessment and human resource needs.  The list provides a nice overview of eLearning management considerations for most curriculum in higher education. However, future application of this tool still need to be studied.

If you need to take a closer look at your college’s online curriculum quality, I highly recommend reading this guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education. 

Reference:

Wasfy, N. F., Abouzeid, E., Nasser, A. A., Ahmed, S. A., Youssry, I., Hegazy, N. N., Shehata, M. H. K., Kamal, D., Atwa, H. (2021, June 10). A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: A qualitative reflective analysis. BMC Medical Education. BioMed Central. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-021-02752-2

(L)earning (M)ade (S)upportive Through LMS Data 

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Sejdije Fejza, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

In this article, researchers from the University of Queensland in Australia analyzed whether LMS data is useful in understanding learners and their needs. Video based learning management systems were assessed by monitoring how many times a student clicked on a video and the amount of time that video played. Exam results were also reviewed to determine whether LMS data can assist student learning. First, it revealed students’ preferences for learning. Additionally, students can reference back information or work on their own time. They also revealed that shorter videos and content receive the best results when instructing through this LMS. 

This source is helpful for organizations who are deciding what factors to assess in their LMS to support student learning. If individuals adopt this form of analysis to support learning, it is important that they carefully choose the best LMS features to assess. This will avoid limitations in data. For instance, it’s important to consider how engaged students are when watching a video. Therefore, the number of times clicked on a video may not necessarily correlate to whether the viewer is actively paying attention to the video to assist in their learning. 

Reference 

Maloney, S., Axelsen, M., Galligan, L., Turner, J., Redmond, P., Brown, A., Basson, M., & Lawrence, J. (2022). Using LMS log data to explore student engagement with coursework videos. Online Learning, 26(4), 399–423.

Choice and Performance Relationship, Not Always Friendly

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, E Ivy, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

A university faculty member studied the correlation between course registration timeliness & availability of choice in selecting courses, and achieving course completion with higher grades. When early registrants could choose an in-person or online course – and selected online – they completed the course and earned higher grades than their peers who registered late, with only the online option. One of the biggest performance gaps were with drop, fail and withdrawal students. The study concludes, if another face-to-face class was available, some students might have preferred and chosen it, and performed better. The study did not review specific student characteristics. 

I recommend postsecondary educators review this study as they may be interested in its literature review, hypotheses, and data analysis. I find this study conducted by a Judd Leighton School of Business and Economics faculty member to be credible. This study is helpful because it affirms that students have different learning preferences and compatibility with class modality. While some students have adapted to, and even prefer online education, in-person classes may best suit other learners. The findings highlight the importance of choice availability, as students may opt for e-learning courses only when the alternative is no class at all.

Pathak, B. K. (2019). Study of e-learning outcomes: The role of late-registration and self-selection. The e – Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 13(1), 13-19. Retrieved from EJ1239138.pdf (ed.gov)

Assessing Micro-Learning in a Healthcare Education Environment

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Theresa Anderson, graduate student University of St. Francis, MS Training and Development program.

This article on the healthcare education micro-learning environment measure (HEMLEM) is a research article aimed at creating an evidence-based measurement tool for assessing clinical micro-learning environments across several healthcare professional student groups. The authors suggest there may be gaps between what healthcare professional students should be learning and what they learn. The authors took a mixed methods approach to create a micro-learning environment measure. They acknowledge that teaching quality, staff attitudes, and behaviors are critical for a good micro-learning environment. 

The article is helpful for anyone attempting to measure how micro-learning within the education of a healthcare professional environment affects students’ learning. The authors created a measurement tool through a step-wise approach: literature analyzing existing tools, generating new items through thematic analysis of student experiences, the Delphi process involving healthcare educators, piloting the prototype, and item reduction. The item reduction tool was a twelve-question survey of the students with differing healthcare professions. HEMLEM seems to be an efficient way to measure success or what needs to be improved in a micro-learning environment. 

References

Isba, R., Rousseva, C., Wolf, K., & Byrne-Davis, L. (2020). Development of a brief learning environment measure for use in healthcare professions education: The healthcare education micro learning environment measure (HEMLEM). BMC Medical Education, 20(110). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01996-8

Fe Δ  — aka The Iron Triangle

Posted by

0

This post is for your reading pleasure from guest blogger, Daniel Liestman a graduate student in the MS Training and Development program, University of St. Francis (Joliet, IL).

Open distance learning (ODL) universities in South Africa established clusters of facilities and activities known as study centers to improve learning.  One university considered the three variables of the Iron Triangle; access, cost, and quality in evaluating the initiative. The research focused on counting occupancy, questionnaire responses, and cost effectiveness. Students utilizing the new centers responded positively, however most students did not take advantage of the new opportunity. There was a cadre of regular users at the expense of the student body as a whole. The questionnaire queried about cleanliness and staff knowledge/ friendliness. The high occupancy demonstrated cost effectiveness.

The Iron Triangle is not necessarily an equilateral triangle. Circumstances may dictate extending one side at the expense of another. In this study, cost effectiveness was the short side of an Isosceles by being less rigorous and relying so heavily on the occupancy side. This study is less a triangle and more like parallel lines.  A more rigorous cost-effectiveness approach is needed. Perhaps comparing the center’s funding fee with the overall number of students utilizing the new service. Also, the only constituency considered were students. Staff, faculty, IT, business office, campus administrators’ input should also be included and considered. 

Nsamba, A., Bopaper, A., Bongi., L., & Lekay, L. (2021). Student support service excellence evaluation: Balancing the iron triangle of accessibility, cost-effectiveness and quality? Open Praxis, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1168

The Training Debate: Online vs Face-to-Face or BOTH!

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Debra Eungard, a graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

Online learning vs face to face training by Georgina Cooke (2023) is a thought-provoking article.  In the article, Ms. Cooke (2023) discusses the difference between online learning compared to face-to-face learning and goes on to discuss a blended model. She digs into the notion that today’s workforce leans toward online design. Ms. Cooke (2023) gives the reader advantages to online learning that are beneficial to both the company and the employee involved with the training.  She concludes the article by expounding on the benefits of a blended program.  She advises the reader that there are strategies and approaches that can make the blended model the most attractive for all involved.   

The article is an interesting read for both the training department and the employee in that it brings to the forefront the difference between all the different models.  Ms. Cooke (2023) gives clear and concise definitions with tips and strategies that can be implemented.  From the organization’s perspective, this article can be useful when organizing or creating content for remote training, face-to-face, or a blended model.  It allows them to research which model fits their staff’s needs. This article can also be helpful for the remote staff going through the training.  The author explains the importance of all three methods and makes it easy to understand why a company moves towards one approach compared to the other models.

Reference:

Cooke, G. (2023, April 5). Online learning vs face to face training. Elucidat. https://www.elbothucidat.com/blog/online-learning-vs-face-to-face-learning/

The Importance of Accessibility in E-Learnings

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Kelly Andrzejczak, graduate student University of St. Francis, MS Training and Development program.

High performing organizations are making accessibility a top priority when they design e-learnings. These organizations recognize how making courses more accessible can create a positive impact for learners and for the organization. Improving accessibility includes a variety of considerations: descriptive language, high contrast colors, keyboard navigation, closed captioning, screen reader options, and more. Efforts to improve accessibility benefit everyone and make e-learnings experiences more effective for participants. Accessible accommodations are an important consideration to increase organizational performance and ensure you are meeting learner needs.

This article is helpful for individuals who create learning experiences and want to ensure their e-learnings are accommodating and accessible for all learners. This article highlights the benefits that these accommodations can have on individuals with disabilities, but also how they can positively impact everyone. Author, Alex Moore, provides data and examples of what high performing organizations used to improve their accessibility efforts in e-learnings. This information can be found on ATD, the largest association for talent development.

References

Moore, A. (2020, October 15). Don’t overlook accessibility in E-learning | ATD. https://www.td.org/magazines/ctdo-magazine/dont-overlook-accessibility-in-e-learning

Exploring Continuous Assessments

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Breanna Winters, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

This article provides insight into the transition from traditional assessment methods in higher education to continuous assessments with a focus on integrating multiple choice assessments multiple times throughout a semester. Additionally, there are four studies reviewed in the article that question continuous assessment and alternative learner needs. The results of these studies support that having continuous assessments can help recognize when learners are becoming disengaged or experiencing a major life event. The results also confirm that the use of continuous assessments does not create a significant negative learning struggle for those with alternative learning needs (Playfoot et al., 2022).

This article can be useful for anyone whether in higher education, the corporate world, or the non-profit sector. It explores continuous assessments and brings to light the importance of considering if your learners have alternative learning needs and how assessments can impact the learner and feedback provided.

Reference

Playfoot, D., Wilkinson, L. L., & Mead, J. (2022). Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2150834