Higher Education

(L)earning (M)ade (S)upportive Through LMS Data 

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Sejdije Fejza, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

In this article, researchers from the University of Queensland in Australia analyzed whether LMS data is useful in understanding learners and their needs. Video based learning management systems were assessed by monitoring how many times a student clicked on a video and the amount of time that video played. Exam results were also reviewed to determine whether LMS data can assist student learning. First, it revealed students’ preferences for learning. Additionally, students can reference back information or work on their own time. They also revealed that shorter videos and content receive the best results when instructing through this LMS. 

This source is helpful for organizations who are deciding what factors to assess in their LMS to support student learning. If individuals adopt this form of analysis to support learning, it is important that they carefully choose the best LMS features to assess. This will avoid limitations in data. For instance, it’s important to consider how engaged students are when watching a video. Therefore, the number of times clicked on a video may not necessarily correlate to whether the viewer is actively paying attention to the video to assist in their learning. 

Reference 

Maloney, S., Axelsen, M., Galligan, L., Turner, J., Redmond, P., Brown, A., Basson, M., & Lawrence, J. (2022). Using LMS log data to explore student engagement with coursework videos. Online Learning, 26(4), 399–423.

Choice and Performance Relationship, Not Always Friendly

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, E Ivy, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

A university faculty member studied the correlation between course registration timeliness & availability of choice in selecting courses, and achieving course completion with higher grades. When early registrants could choose an in-person or online course – and selected online – they completed the course and earned higher grades than their peers who registered late, with only the online option. One of the biggest performance gaps were with drop, fail and withdrawal students. The study concludes, if another face-to-face class was available, some students might have preferred and chosen it, and performed better. The study did not review specific student characteristics. 

I recommend postsecondary educators review this study as they may be interested in its literature review, hypotheses, and data analysis. I find this study conducted by a Judd Leighton School of Business and Economics faculty member to be credible. This study is helpful because it affirms that students have different learning preferences and compatibility with class modality. While some students have adapted to, and even prefer online education, in-person classes may best suit other learners. The findings highlight the importance of choice availability, as students may opt for e-learning courses only when the alternative is no class at all.

Pathak, B. K. (2019). Study of e-learning outcomes: The role of late-registration and self-selection. The e – Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 13(1), 13-19. Retrieved from EJ1239138.pdf (ed.gov)

Fe Δ  — aka The Iron Triangle

Posted by

0

This post is for your reading pleasure from guest blogger, Daniel Liestman a graduate student in the MS Training and Development program, University of St. Francis (Joliet, IL).

Open distance learning (ODL) universities in South Africa established clusters of facilities and activities known as study centers to improve learning.  One university considered the three variables of the Iron Triangle; access, cost, and quality in evaluating the initiative. The research focused on counting occupancy, questionnaire responses, and cost effectiveness. Students utilizing the new centers responded positively, however most students did not take advantage of the new opportunity. There was a cadre of regular users at the expense of the student body as a whole. The questionnaire queried about cleanliness and staff knowledge/ friendliness. The high occupancy demonstrated cost effectiveness.

The Iron Triangle is not necessarily an equilateral triangle. Circumstances may dictate extending one side at the expense of another. In this study, cost effectiveness was the short side of an Isosceles by being less rigorous and relying so heavily on the occupancy side. This study is less a triangle and more like parallel lines.  A more rigorous cost-effectiveness approach is needed. Perhaps comparing the center’s funding fee with the overall number of students utilizing the new service. Also, the only constituency considered were students. Staff, faculty, IT, business office, campus administrators’ input should also be included and considered. 

Nsamba, A., Bopaper, A., Bongi., L., & Lekay, L. (2021). Student support service excellence evaluation: Balancing the iron triangle of accessibility, cost-effectiveness and quality? Open Praxis, 13(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1168

Exploring Continuous Assessments

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Breanna Winters, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

This article provides insight into the transition from traditional assessment methods in higher education to continuous assessments with a focus on integrating multiple choice assessments multiple times throughout a semester. Additionally, there are four studies reviewed in the article that question continuous assessment and alternative learner needs. The results of these studies support that having continuous assessments can help recognize when learners are becoming disengaged or experiencing a major life event. The results also confirm that the use of continuous assessments does not create a significant negative learning struggle for those with alternative learning needs (Playfoot et al., 2022).

This article can be useful for anyone whether in higher education, the corporate world, or the non-profit sector. It explores continuous assessments and brings to light the importance of considering if your learners have alternative learning needs and how assessments can impact the learner and feedback provided.

Reference

Playfoot, D., Wilkinson, L. L., & Mead, J. (2022). Is continuous assessment inclusive? An analysis of factors influencing student grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2150834

Incorporating the Latest Assessment Trends for E-Learning

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Debra Eungard, a graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

eLearning Assessment Trends and Strategies by Sumit Satardekar (2021) is a thought-provoking read. Satadekar (2021) begins the article by explaining eLearning trends and strategies. He moves on to define qualitative testing to his audience. In his discussion, he brings up some pros and cons of implementation for assessment purposes.  From there he moves on to explain 3 major strategies for implementation:   continuous assessment, decision-making scenarios, and open-ended questions. In each section, the author gives tips on making implementation meaningful. He wraps the article up by offering some final thoughts on this topic such as why it is important to make the switch to these latest trends for assessment for the evolving eLearning community.

The article is beneficial for both the facilitator and the learner in that it gives some valuable tips in the area of assessment. Gaining information in regards to understanding the latest trends and sharing a couple of those trends, the reader is handed tools to implement. From the facilitator’s perspective, these trends can be useful when implementing engaging assessments into the online curriculum. By engaging the learner, the facilitator is creating a valid tool for assessment. As a learner, you can gain insight into assessments and see their value for online learning.

Reference

Satardekar, S. (2021, December 22). Elearning Assessment Trends and Strategies. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/elearning-assessment-trends-and-strategies

Live Vs. Multimedia Teaching? Psychomotor Skills & PT Students

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Tricia Padgurskis, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

Should physical therapy students learn from live or multimedia demonstrations of manual therapy techniques?  Do you think multimedia instruction is sufficient for your physical therapist to learn to work on your injuries?

In the peer-reviewed, Educational Research Journal, Ivey and Parrish (2021) report the results of a live versus multimedia instruction of physical therapy students. Typically, physical therapy students need to be evaluated in the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains to properly perform orthopedic patient assessments. In this study, physical therapy students were evaluated on their psychomotor skills of patient upper and lower extremity manual assessment (Ivey & Parrish 2021). Two cohorts of students were either assigned to a live instruction or multimedia instruction with video group on these orthopedic techniques.  Interestingly, the two cohorts did not have a significant difference in skill performance. 

Does this mean that multimedia instruction is efficient enough to teach physical therapists?  Is skill level considered? Does the quality of media impact learning? To learn more, read this well researched article of instruction methods in physical therapy student psychomotor performance outcomes.

Ivey, C. J., & Parrish, A. A. (2022). Comparison of live demonstration versus multimedia instruction for

psychomotor skill development in physical therapy students. Educational Research: Theory and

Practice, 33(3), 35-46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1366421.pdf

Considering Values in eLearning

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Breanna Winters, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

In this article, Liz Johnson (2021) questions the framework of distance learning and shared ideas on using Paul and Elder’s Concepts Depicting Ethical Behavior and Motivation. She reviews that these concepts are rooted in behaviors such as empathy, compassion, kindness, forgiveness etc. which are displayed through a comprehensive chart. Johnson (2021) expresses the need to incorporate these behaviors to create a framework before considering the technology that is to be used, as well as what policies are put in place. Additionally, she emphasizes throughout her article the importance of being socially responsible and speaks of the collective future.

This resource could be utilized by those in higher education or any business looking to implement eLearning technologies into their learning experiences. In particular, this would be a useful conversation to have when developing policies around eLearning, creating expectations of experiences for the learners and selecting technologies to implement. The resource is reliable and provides credible references.

Reference:

Johnson, L. (2021). Do values in online learning in higher education really matter to our collective future? JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE FOR POLICY IMPLICATIONS, 9(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15640/jsspi.v9n2a1

Finding Value in Self-Directed Learning

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Debra Eungard, a graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in the Training and Development program.

Self-directed learning in higher education is a relevant topic in today’s e-learning world.  Learners can visit Khan Academy, YouTube, and TedTalks in order to achieve self-directed learning.  The article, 13 Ways to Develop Self-Directed Learning and Learn Faster, discusses how self-directed learning works.  Ho (2023) breaks down self-directed learning in five ways: what is self-directed learning, self-directed characteristics, how to develop self-directed learning, final thoughts, and gives more tips for learning.  The author also gives the reader productivity tools for staying organized, focused, and energized. Another helpful component of this article is how to develop self-directed learning. To most people, self-directed learning is a concept that you either have or you don’t.  Ho (2023) states that there are tips to help a learner develop self-directed learning.  “Self-directed learning is the key to having a more enriching learning experience.” (Ho, 2023)

Self-directed learning is so relevant to higher education.  The author explains that self-directed learning falls into 3 Ls:  lifelong learning, leverage, and labor of love.  This article is beneficial for a number of reasons:  it breaks down the meaning of self-directed learning, gives the reader different tools for improving self-directed learning, and gives a number of strategies to develop self-directed learning. The author concludes this article by suggesting different articles that can be valuable to the reader.

Reference

Ho, L. (2023). 13 Ways to Develop Self-Directed Learning and Learn Faster. https://www.lifehack.org/851922/self-directed-learning

Emerging Technologies and eLearning-Raising the Bar

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, Danielle Victoriano, graduate student University of St. Francis, MS Training and Development program.

E-Learning is evolving to create the ultimate self-driven and self-paced yet interactive design. It is emerging into an interactive model that is intuitive for the learners’ needs. Is this what learners need and want? Will this aid them in achieving their goals? Mangalvedhe examines this in this 2023 article. The author examines how emerging technologies can influence and transform learning and development moving forward. In the article, the author examines how artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality, gamification, mobile learning and microlearning will change how we interact and respond within the learning model to a more profound level than we have in eLearning.

This is an excellent article for content creators and instructional designers that are seeking ways to provide interaction and take learning to an application level. The author examines in detail how each technology can be integrated into instructional design. Mangalvedhe (2023) also discusses how each technology can fulfill and appeal to the various needs of learners. Examples are provided to suggest how these technologies can be executed successfully in the created content. These examples will be a starting point to consider using these advanced technologies that workplaces are already utilizing to raise the bar of flexible and efficient learning while expediting the upskilling process.  

References

Mangalvedhe, A. (2023, January 12). The emerging technologies in Elearning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/the-emerging-technologies-in-elearning

Grading E-learning Outcomes, Pun Intended

Posted by

0

This post is provided by guest blogger, E Ivy, graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, MS in Training and Development program.

The writer of the Brown Center Chalkboard blog suggests there could be cause for concern for the online learning levels of higher education students. While much of the post-pandemic attention surrounding e-learning loss has been given to K-12 learners, data reveals college students performed worse in e-learning courses than in face-to-face classes. For learners who are male and less academically prepared, the negative implications of online learning are greater.  However, differences in characteristics of students who choose in-person versus online options may impact some outcomes. At least one finding indicates hybrid courses experience similar results to in-person learning.

This blog site with writings by scholars and fellows in association with the research and public policy-based Brookings Institution is a credible source. I recommend higher education faculty and administrators review the article, as they may be interested in its assessment. The information, with research links included, is helpful in that it discusses and suggests we give attention to postsecondary online learning (in addition to K-12 education). As e-learning continues to expand and evolve, educators may be able to glean from this information and adjust where needed, to help ensure virtual learners are learning as effectively as their in-person counterparts.

Cellini, S. R. (2021, August 13). How does virtual learning impact students in higher education?. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2021/08/13/how-does-virtual-learning-impact-students-in-higher-education/