This post is provided by guest blogger, Rachel Dobrich Ruffetti, a graduate student at the University of St. Francis in Joliet, working towards the Talent Development Certificate.
The article, “Identifying Pedagogical Design and Implementation of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms” by Karabey and Karaman (2024), analyzes 53 instructional activities categorized into 11 themes based on Robert M. Gagne’s teaching framework. The study evaluates technical and environmental control, clarity, introductory activities, technological tools, course materials, interaction, feedback, time management, summarization, and self-assessment. It emphasizes how these themes enhance cognitive processing, student engagement, and instructional effectiveness. Recommendations include optimizing technology use, minimizing distractions, fostering interaction through collaboration tools, summarizing key points, providing timely feedback, and managing time efficiently. Implementing these recommendations can improve virtual learning experiences by making lessons more structured, engaging, and effective.
This peer-reviewed study is valuable for higher education instructors designing synchronous virtual courses. It offers research-supported recommendations to enhance student engagement and instructional quality. By integrating interactive tools, instructors provide opportunities for students to engage directly with learning materials. They can utilize these platforms to provide meaningful feedback and tailor instruction to students’ unique needs. As technology advances, educators must refine their virtual teaching strategies to remain effective. These efforts will create inclusive learning environments that enhance participation, interaction, convenience, and efficiency. Karabey and Karaman’s compilation of activities and applications provides a practical guide for instructors to conduct virtual classrooms effectively.
References
Sinem Cilligol Karabey, & Selcuk Karaman. (2024). Identifying pedagogical design and implementation of synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(2), 132–154. https://research-ebsco-com.ezproxy.stfrancis.edu/linkprocessor/plink?id=6bb4edba-b6f3-3c25-9aa6-60cfbcf9df09